Get my agent

Retrospective summary

Turn a messy retro board into themes and a small number of changes the team will actually make.

Last tested 2026-10-19 Its example inputs were run through Claude Haiku 5.5, and an AI judge (Jev) scored the reply 75/100 for following the rules and doing the task.

Your details
⌘ Enter
Prompt previewUpdates as you type

Fill in the required fields, then build your prompt.

Free. Run it here sends the prompt through our server to Claude and shows the draft on this page (5 runs a day free, 100 on a paid plan); we don't store it. Open in ChatGPT, Claude, or Grok sends the prompt to that tool instead. Sign in there first, or the prompt box may come up empty; if it does, use Copy and paste it in.

Example output

I wrote this by hand on 2026-10-19 from the made-up inputs below, to show what a good result looks like. Your results will vary, so read every draft before you use it.

Example inputs
  • Retro notes or sticky notes: went well: design review fast, Ben's homepage. didn't: waited on legal forever, too many meetings, unclear who approves copy. ideas: one approver for copy, no-meeting Wednesday
  • Team: Web team
What went well
- Design reviews moved fast.
- The homepage build went smoothly.

What didn't
- Waiting on approvals: Legal took a long time, and it wasn't clear who approves copy.
- Too many meetings.

Quotes
"Waited on legal forever."
"Unclear who approves copy."

Changes for next sprint
1. Name one person who approves copy. Owner: ___. It worked if no copy waits more than 2 days for approval.
2. Try a no-meeting Wednesday. Owner: ___. It worked if the team says they got more focus time.
3. Agree on a turnaround date with Legal for each request. Owner: ___. It worked if Legal replies by the agreed date.

AI drafts can be wrong. Check every fact, name, and number before you send anything. Free: build prompts with no limit and 5 AI runs a day. A paid plan: 100 runs a day, 1,000 checks a day, batch runs for 50 contacts.

More for project managers